RULES OF EVIDENCE ADMISSIBILITY Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

RULES OF EVIDENCE ADMISSIBILITY - Research Paper ExampleDespite the gigantic demonstrate presented against the suspect, the defense attorney, Johnnie Cochran was fitted to convince the jurors that in that respect was reasonable doubt that O.J Simpson had actually committed crimes against him (Schuetz and Lilley, 1999). The case is Americas just about publicized. However, Cochrans success did not rely mostly on evidence or lack of it nevertheless maximized on the trivial errors committed by both the prosecutors and the Los Angeles Police incision at the crime candidate and the court room (Kaplan, 2009). The tampered gloves, inconsistencies in the simple eye sample handling and poor crime scene instruction are some of the most outstanding weaknesses that Chrochan capitalized on. It was only in a later civil ruling that Simpson was charged with the wrongful death of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. The blunders committed during the homicide trials contributed immensely to the suspects acquittal. If the detectives and attorneys involved in the prosecution had been more careful, the case could probably have ended successfully, with a Proof beyond bonnie Doubt that Simpson was actually responsible for the deaths (Kaplan, 2009). This paper will highlight the mistakes committed during the trials by the Los Angeles Police Department during the homicide trial and attorneys and lawyers should improve their investigative processes. For instance, the DNA samples brought in by the prosecution were highly questioned. It was unambiguous that the inception samples had been tampered with due to constant movement and flow of custody, where he pointed one of the custodians as a medical student. Cochran charge the police officers concerned of incompetence in handling of evidence. From all evidence, it is quite evident that someone had tested to tamper with the blood samples despite the fact that they were in the custody of the policemen. In such a scenario, the blood samples could not provide accurate results. Again, the evidence stash away from the crime scene was extremely dubitable. Ogle () states that there should be a clear order in a crime scene. In O.J Simpsons case, it was evident that many people had entered the scene before the detective had arrived and that even after his arrival, he did not install an order of who was allowed to enter (Hunt, 1994). He left and entered the scene several times, all this while leaving unlike people in charge. This on its part had more serious repercussions later on in the evidence collection. The large number of people who entered the scene before the arrival of the detective may have tampered with the collected evidence and this evidence was not reliable for trial. A similar scenario is observed in the possibility of deep-rooted blood traces found on the glove during the hearings. Oscar had submitted a blood sample to the police during an interrogation. Consequently, the capacity was not recorded, c reating a room for doubt that some blood could have been sneaked out of the laboratory into Browns home (Kaplan, 2009). Moreover, detective Lange covered Nicoles body with one of her blankets to protect it from photographers. By failing to handling a new unused sheet, the possibility that a transfer could have occurred became inevitable. Though no outside(prenominal) material was found on her, whether the blanket picked up her attackers prints will remain a mere speculation, for that cannot be sufficiently proven. Another weakness found in evidence handling in